Study Shows Low Risk of Vaccinia Transfer After Smallpox Immunization
ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- The threat of bioterrorism has led to the recommendation to vaccinate healthcare workers and other first responders, but some worry about the side effects of smallpox vaccination, which can harm children, pregnant women and people with immune disorders or certain skin conditions. According to an article published in the Feb. 15, 2004 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, now available online, people vaccinated against smallpox pose a low risk of accidentally inoculating others if they follow proper bandaging and hand-washing procedures.
Smallpox vaccinations leave an open wound on the upper arm containing a live virus that could infect others. If a child, a person with eczema or someone with an immune disorder is infected, the virus can cause serious health problems or death. Consequently, some hospitals decided that health care workers should not be vaccinated against smallpox to prevent accidental transmission of the virus to vulnerable patients.
"Hopefully, this study has helped reassure individuals about the transmission of smallpox," says lead author Thomas Talbot, MD, of Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The risk of transmission is vastly reduced if those vaccinated against smallpox keep the vaccine site bandaged and practice "good, thorough hand-washing with soap and water or an alcohol-based product" after changing the bandage, says Talbot.
Talbot sees no need for everyone to get vaccinated against smallpox, because civilian and military vaccination campaigns have created a safety net of sorts. "If someone were to intentionally release smallpox, we have our first wave of health care responders protected," he says. The vaccine can be administered as long as three to four days after exposure, so health care workers who have been vaccinated could "take care of patients and vaccinate everybody else" in the days following an attack, says Talbot.
Whether hospitals will change policies regarding vaccinations for health care workers based on the study's outcome remains to be seen. "It's been an interesting question, and hopefully now we've got a lot of contemporary data to help answer it," says Dr. Talbot.
Source: Infectious Diseases Society of America
Obituary: In Memory of SMART4TB and Project ACCELERATE
March 14th 2025In this remembrance of SMART4TB and Project ACCLERATE, 2 global health initiatives, Heather Stoltzfus, MPH, RN, CIC, explains what they are and why they serve as a warning of what has been lost and what more could be lost in the future.
The Art of Wise Leadership in Infection Control and Quality Management
March 14th 2025Discover how wise leadership in infection control transforms challenges into opportunities, fosters teamwork, and safeguards patient safety through emotional intelligence, strategic vision, and inspiring action.
The CDC at a Crossroads: Budget Cuts, Public Health, and the Growing Threat of Infectious Diseases
March 12th 2025Budget cuts to the CDC threaten disease surveillance, outbreak response, and public health programs, increasing risks from measles, avian flu, and future pandemics while straining health care infrastructure nationwide.
Standing Up for Science: A Rally Participant’s Perspective
March 11th 2025Infection Control Today's Editorial Advisory Board member and contributing editor, Heather Stoltzfus, MPH, RN, CIC, recently joined the Stand Up for Science rally in Washington, DC. She gives a first-person perspective on the rally and the rally-goers' strong message.
