Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Vaccine Liability Case

Article

The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments currently in the case of Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, in which a Pennsylvania family asserts it should be able to sue Wyeth, a division of Pfizer Inc., over injuries from side effects caused by a diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine.

According to reports in The Wall Street Journal, the family says Wyeth should have marketed a safer vaccine. The justices are debating the meaning of "unavoidable side effects" referenced in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which created a national compensation program for claims of vaccine injury, protecting manufacturers against lawsuits over injuries stemming from "unavoidable side effects."

To read further from The Wall Street Journal, CLICK HERE.

Recent Videos
Anna Castillo-Gutierrez, CRCST, CSPDT, CHL, CIS, CFER,  and Maya Luera, CRCST, CIS, CER, CHL
Lucy Witt, MD
Chase Elms, BS, CRCST
Garrett Hollembeak, CRCST, CIS, CHL, CER, CIC
Hannah Schroeder, BSHA, CRCST, CIS, CHL, CER,
Anthony Bondon CRCST, CHL, BSM, AAS, SME, LSSYB
Deannard Esnard, CRCST, CIS, CER, CHL, CFER, CQUIA
Kevin Bush, Jr, DHSc, EdD, MSHA, MA, MS, FACHE
Vatsala Rangachar Srinivasa, MPH
Related Content