|Articles|January 23, 2013

Swedish Researchers Investigate Protective Capacity of Surgical Attire

To prevent surgical site infection it is desirable to keep bacterial counts low in the operating room air during orthopedic surgery, especially prosthetic surgery. As the airborne bacteria are mainly derived from the skin flora of the personnel present in the operating room a reduction could be achieved by using a clothing system for staff made from a material fulfilling the requirements in the standard EN 13795. The aim of a study by Tammelin, et al. (2012) was to compare the protective capacity between three clothing systems made of different materials one mixed cotton/polyester and two polyesters - which all had passed the tests according to EN 13795.

Measuring of CFU/m3 air was performed during 21 orthopedic procedures performed in four operating rooms with turbulent, mixing ventilation with air flows of 755 1,050 L/s. All staff in the operating room wore clothes made from the same material during each surgical procedure.

The source strength (mean value of CFU emitted from one person per second) calculated for the three garments were 4.1, 2.4 and 0.6 respectively. In an operating room with an air flow of 755 L/s both clothing systems made of polyester reduced the amount of CFU/m3 significantly compared to the clothing system made from mixed material. In an operating room with air intake of 1,050 L/s a significant reduction was only achieved with the polyester that had the lowest source strength.

The researchers concluded that polyester has a better protective capacity than cotton/polyester. They say there is need for more discriminating tests of the protective efficacy of textile materials intended to use for operating garment. Their research was published in Patient Safety in Surgery.  

Reference: Tammelin A, Ljungqvist B and Reinmüller B. Comparison of three distinct surgical clothing systems for protection from air-borne bacteria: A prospective observational study. Patient Safety in Surgery 2012, 6:23 doi:10.1186/1754-9493-6-23

Newsletter

Stay prepared and protected with the Infection Control Today newsletter, delivering essential updates, best practices, and expert insights for infection prevention professionals.

Subscribe

Related to this article

Image of Pathogens flying   (Adobe Stock weerasak)
Behind every landmark in infection prevention, from antimicrobial stewardship guidelines to the COVID-19 town halls that reached flight attendants and teachers, is a generation of physician-scientists who led SHEA through crises, organizational change, and scientific breakthroughs. Infection Control Today traces 30 years of SHEA presidents and the lasting mark they left on the field.
A brightly lit Hospital operating room, a surgical team wearing gowns and masks.  (Adobe Stock 1790696595 by Damian)
Turnover pressure can leave critical OR cleaning steps unfinished. Karen deKay, MSN, RN, EBP-C, CNOR, CIC, FAPIC, examines common gaps in environmental hygiene and how shared responsibilities, attention to disinfectant contact time, and ongoing education can help teams strengthen practices between cases.
Water  (Adobe Stock 456102510 by stockphoto-graf)
Understanding current water quality is a starting point for ST108 implementation. John Kimsey, vice president of processing optimization and customer success for STERIS, spoke about his HSPA presentation on assessing readiness, distinguishing system qualification from routine testing, and understanding where water samples should be collected.
AORN26 New Orleans 2026  (Adobe Stock)
Missing instruments and processing delays can strain OR–SPD relationships. At AORN 2026, John Kimsey, vice president of processing optimization and customer success for STERIS, discusses understanding root causes, exploring off-site reprocessing for ambulatory surgical centers, and using hands-on simulation to help surgical teams see sterile processing from a different perspective.