The hospital environment poses a substantial risk for transmission of pathogens. However, assessing cleaning efficiency is difficult and often is carried out by a subjective visual check only. The ATP-bioluminescence assay technology was developed to assist in evaluation of the environmental cleaning process by counting living and non-living organic matter in Relative Light Units (RLUs). In a 1,000-bed university-affiliated hospital the standard practice following patient discharge includes terminal cleaning of the patient unit performed by nursing aides associated with the ward.
Nativ et al. (2013) sought to compare, in RLUs, the outcome of environmental and terminal cleaning in hospital wards using dedicated trained maintenance personnel (strategy 1) versus routine departmental cleaning (strategy 2). An additional purpose was to evaluate the applicability of the ATP-bioluminescence assay technology.
An experimental design with an intervention (strategy 1) and control (strategy 2) was conducted on four comparable medical wards. Two wards used cleaning strategy 1 for terminal cleaning and the other two used cleaning strategy 2 as controls. Ten sites were examined in each ward with ATP-bioluminescence assay: six sites of high risk patient contact areas 30 minutes following terminal cleaning, and 4 sites for general environmental surroundings.
Seven hundred seventy samples were collected; 373 from the intervention group wards and 397 from the control group wards. A statistically significant difference was found in 2 out of 6 high risk patient contact sites in the patient units: 1) the bed rails, with a median of 397 RLUs in the intervention group vs. 752 RLUs in the control group (p<0.001); and 2) the call button, with medians of 338 and 535 RLUs in the intervention and control group, respectively (p<0.002).
The researchers conclude that assigning a dedicated and trained team for terminal cleaning as a cleaning strategy demonstrated superiority at least in 2 out of 6 high-touch surface areas. The ATP-bioluminescence assay technology is a convenient way to check general cleanliness.
Reference: Nativ R, Riven IL and Borer A. Oral presentation O065 at 2nd International Conference on Prevention and Infection Control (ICPIC 2013): Using adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP)-bioluminescence assay to compare outcomes of two strategies to perform environmental cleaning in a hospital setting. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 2013, 2(Suppl 1):O65 doi:10.1186/2047-2994-2-S1-O65
Disclosures: R. Nativ received grant/research support from M3 Israel and CHEMITEC; I. Livshiz Riven, none declared; A. Borer, none declared.
AHE Exchange Summit 2025 Brings EVS and Infection Prevention Experts Together in Columbus, Ohio
June 9th 2025The Association for the Health Care Environment (AHE) is set to host its largest event of the year—Exchange Summit 2025—from June 8 to 11 in Columbus, Ohio. With over 600 environmental services (EVS) professionals expected to attend, this year’s conference focuses heavily on infection prevention, interdepartmental collaboration, and education that empowers frontline health care support leaders to improve patient safety and operational efficiency.
Far UV-C Light Shows Promise for Decontaminating Medical Equipment in Clinical Settings
June 4th 2025Manual cleaning gaps on shared hospital equipment can undermine infection control efforts. New research shows far UV-C light can serve as a safe, automated backup to reduce contamination in real-world clinical settings.
Unmasking Vaccine Myths: Dr Marschall Runge on Measles, Misinformation, and Public Health Solutions
May 29th 2025As measles cases climb across the US, discredited myths continue to undercut public trust in vaccines. In an exclusive interview with Infection Control Today, Michigan Medicine’s Marschall Runge, PhD, confronts misinformation head-on and explores how clinicians can counter it with science, empathy, and community engagement.
Silent Saboteurs: Managing Endotoxins for Sepsis-Free Sterilization
Invisible yet deadly, endotoxins evade traditional sterilization methods, posing significant risks during routine surgeries. Understanding and addressing their threat is critical for patient safety.