Gloves and gowns are common intensive care unit (ICU) fomites that are frequently contaminated with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Guidelines recommend use of contact precautions for healthcare personnel (HCP) when dealing with patients infected with MRSA, but the efficacy of these standards are unclear.
In a study presented at IDWeek 2019, investigators with the University of Maryland, Weill Cornell Medicine, and Harbor UCLA sought to determine which patients are more likely to transfer MRSA to HCP gloves or gowns and to identify HCP interactions more likely to lead to glove or gown contamination.
The study comprised a total of 402 MRSA-colonized patients and 3982 HCP interactions. The research team cultured HCP gloves and gowns following patient interaction but before doffing. They also sampled patients’ anterior nares, perianal area, chest, and arms to assess the association between bacterial burden and contamination.
HCP gloves and gowns were contaminated with MRSA in 14.3% and 5.9% of interactions, respectively. Contamination of either gloves or gowns occurred in 16.2% of interactions.
In terms of HCP types associated with the highest rates of contamination, occupational/physical therapists were at high risk (odds ratio [OR]: 6.96 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.51-13.79]), followed by respiratory therapists (OR: 5.34 [95% CI: 3.04-9.39]), when compared with the “other” category.
Naturally, HCP who have to physically touch patients are more at risk of contamination (OR: 2.59 [95% CI: 1.04-6.51]) when compared with HCP who touch nothing in a patient’s room. Furthermore, HCP who touched only the environment were not at risk of contamination (OR: 1.13 [95% CI: 0.43, 3.00]) when compared with touching nothing.
Investigators also identified an association between increasing bacterial burden in the patient’s nares, perianal area, and chest skin and glove or gown contamination.
“Contamination of HCP gloves and gowns with MRSA occurs frequently when caring for ICU patients,” investigators concluded. “Hospitals may consider optimizing contact precautions by using less precautions for low-risk interactions and more precautions for high-risk interactions.”
The study, Considerations for a Targeted Approach to Contact Precautions for Patients with MRSA in Hospitals: A Multicenter Cohort Study to Identify High-Risk Patient Characteristics and Healthcare Personnel Interactions, will be presented in an oral abstract session on Friday, October 4, 2019, at IDWeek in Washington, DC.
The Next Frontier in Infection Control: AI-Driven Operating Rooms
Published: July 15th 2025 | Updated: July 15th 2025Discover how AI-powered sensors, smart surveillance, and advanced analytics are revolutionizing infection prevention in the OR. Herman DeBoard, PhD, discusses how these technologies safeguard sterile fields, reduce SSIs, and help hospitals balance operational efficiency with patient safety.
CDC Urges Vigilance: New Recommendations for Monitoring and Testing H5N1 Exposures
July 11th 2025With avian influenza A(H5N1) infections surfacing in both animals and humans, the CDC has issued updated guidance calling for aggressive monitoring and targeted testing to contain the virus and protect public health.
A Helping Hand: Innovative Approaches to Expanding Hand Hygiene Programs in Acute Care Settings
July 9th 2025Who knew candy, UV lights, and a college kid in scrubs could double hand hygiene adherence? A Pennsylvania hospital’s creative shake-up of its infection prevention program shows that sometimes it takes more than soap to get hands clean—and keep them that way.