News|Articles|September 23, 2026

How Can OR Teams Improve Environmental Cleaning Between Surgical Cases?

Turnover pressure can leave critical OR cleaning steps unfinished. Karen deKay, MSN, RN, EBP-C, CNOR, CIC, FAPIC, examines common gaps in environmental hygiene and how shared responsibilities, attention to disinfectant contact time, and ongoing education can help teams strengthen practices between cases.

Five back-to-back cases. A full waiting room. An urgent add-on that just landed on the schedule. Every operating room (OR) team knows what turnover pressure feels like, and I’ve spent enough time studying environmental hygiene to know exactly where that pressure does its damage: in the small cleaning steps that get skipped when the next case is already waiting.

As lead author of the recent update to the Association of periOperative Registered Nurses’s (AORN’s) Guideline for Environmental Hygiene (formerly the Guideline for Environmental Cleaning), I’ve looked closely at how that pressure plays out in real turnovers, and where the process can be strengthened.

My top recommendation isn’t a product or a checklist. It’s a team approach. Environmental hygiene is everyone’s responsibility, because any missed surface is a chance for the OR to become a vector for infection transmission. That team is bigger than the surgical staff alone. Guidance on OR cleaning programs generally calls for a multidisciplinary team, including perioperative leadership, infection prevention, environmental services (EVS), and facilities, all working from the same expectations for what gets cleaned, when, and by whom. Without that shared ownership, cleaning steps become “someone else’s job,” and that’s exactly when they get missed.

Top 3 Takeaways

  1. Turnover pressure can undermine OR cleaning. Missed surfaces, shortened disinfectant contact times, and premature restocking create gaps between cases.
  1. Clear responsibilities support consistent practice. Perioperative staff, infection prevention, environmental services, and facilities need shared expectations for who cleans what and when.
  1. Ongoing training helps sustain improvement. Repeated education and competency checks reinforce cleaning practices when busy schedules put them under pressure.

Where Turnover Pressure Causes the Most Misses

Here’s what I see slip most often when a room is turning over fast:

Reaching for a single cloth or wipe and using it across several different surfaces.

  • Skipping cleaning and disinfection altogether on items or areas that had contact during the case.
  • Setting sterile packages or sheets down on a surface before the disinfectant has had its full contact/dwell/kill time (the duration required to actually achieve disinfection).
  • Wiping fast enough that part of the surface never gets covered or stays visibly wet with disinfectant.
  • Working on “dirty” areas before “clean” ones, or bouncing between the 2 instead of moving in 1 direction.
  • Rushing past high-touch items without giving them the same disinfection attention as larger surfaces.
  • Restocking clean or sterile supplies before environmental hygiene is fully finished.

The stakes behind this list are higher than they might look. Some pathogens associated with surgical site infections, including Clostridioides difficile, can persist on hard surfaces for months, and research on hospital fomites has found that high-touch surfaces continue to drive transmission even when they receive more frequent cleaning than low-touch surfaces. A missed step during one turnover isn’t an isolated lapse; it leaves a surface contaminated until the next cleaning cycle catches it.

3 Practices With the Biggest Impact

If a team can only focus on a few things during a fast turnover, these 3 practices are where that focus pays off most.

1. Follow the disinfectant label, down to the minute.

The disinfectant’s manufacturer’s instructions for use (IFU) or product label specifies the wet contact time required to kill the specific microorganisms it targets, such as viruses, C difficile, other bacteria, and that time only counts if the surface remains visibly wet for the entire duration. If it starts to dry, add more product rather than letting the clock run on a surface that is no longer wet.

Contact times vary by product and target organism, ranging from roughly 30 seconds to 10 minutes or more. For organisms like C difficile, the CDC specifically calls for an EPA-registered sporicidal disinfectant used for its full labeled contact time, since standard disinfectants aren’t effective against spores. Building a few extra seconds into the turnover workflow for reapplication is a smaller cost than reworking a surface that was cleared before it was actually disinfected.

2. Move clean to dirty, never dirty to clean.

Work outward from the cleanest surfaces toward the most contaminated ones, never the reverse, so contaminants don’t ride along from a dirty surface onto one that’s already been cleaned. The same logic applies vertically. Gravity pulls dust, debris, and disinfectant runoff downward, so tackling high surfaces first keeps that fallout from landing on areas still waiting for their turn.

This sequencing also aligns with how the CDC generally tiers the cleaning risk of health care surfaces. Low-touch surfaces such as floors and walls carry lower transmission risk than high-touch surfaces like OR tables, equipment controls, and light handles. Those high-touch surfaces are exactly the ones a cloth or mop head should reach last, once it’s no longer carrying contamination picked up earlier in the room. A sequence like this only holds up if everyone cleaning the room follows the same order. One person skipping ahead undoes the logic for the whole team.

3. Give every room its own clean material.
A cloth, wipe, or mop head that’s already touched one room shouldn’t touch another. Carrying it over from bay to bay carries contaminants along, and used material can’t disinfect as reliably as fresh material.

The risk here isn’t theoretical. A study on hospital cleaning practices found that reused cloth towels carried high microbial loads even after standard laundering, and that towels can interfere with the disinfectants they’re soaked in. Laundering alone isn’t a reliable safeguard, which is why the workflow itself has to be built around a clean material at the start of every room, not a laundering or restocking process that’s assumed to catch what the workflow misses.

Building the Habit, Not Just the Awareness

Perioperative nurses and environmental services professionals should start preparing now for what the updated guideline will ask of them, because how we approach cleaning and disinfection in the perioperative environment is changing. But awareness of a new guideline only goes so far. The real goal is to engage staff, support a genuine culture shift, and raise the profile of the people doing this work: EVS, who is too often an afterthought in how OR personnel think about infection prevention.

Ongoing education is what makes that culture shift hold. Cleaning steps that get taught once tend to erode under the same turnover pressure that causes the misses described above, and knowledge of a guideline update doesn’t change practice unless it’s revisited regularly. One hospital’s repeated training initiative for nursing and EVS staff found that the percentage of surfaces cleaned to standard rose from 20% after the first training session to 49% after the second and 82% after the third, with corresponding drops in C difficile, surgical site, and central line-associated infection rates over the same period.

A single in-service isn’t enough to change behavior at that scale; it’s the repetition that closes the gap between knowing a step and reliably doing it under pressure. Recurring competency checks, especially ones that revisit the specific misses a team already struggles with, keep environmental hygiene from sliding back into old shortcuts once the initial push around a new guideline fades.

Before the updated guideline is released, it’s worth getting the whole team into the same room to walk through current turnover practices together. Half the value of a guideline update comes from the conversation it forces a team to have about where its own process actually breaks down.

For teams that want to get ahead of the update, AORN’s Guideline Essentials for Environmental Hygiene (exclusive member content) offers a set of implementation tools worth working through together. That includes checklists for general environmental hygiene, multidrug-resistant organism cleaning, sterile processing, and OR/preop/postop turnover, along with guidance on differentiating cleaning procedures for high-touch objects and worked examples of between-patient cleaning in both surgical and preop/postop areas.


Related to this article

Infection preventionists in full PPE with children in DRC.  (Image credit: author with AI)
Nearly 4 months into the DRC's Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak, some indicators suggest transmission may be slowing. But shifting hotspots, treatment-center capacity problems, community deaths, and incomplete surveillance data show why national case totals alone cannot determine whether containment has been achieved.
Dyan Troxell, MSN, RN, director of clinical education at HandCraft Linen Services; J.J. Odom, MBA, CHESP, CMIP, T-CHEST, university director of buildings and grounds for UConn Health and chair-elect of the AHE Board; and Jenna Rivers, MPH, CPH, CIC, manager of infection prevention and control at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.
At AHE Exchange 2026, ICT spoke with experts representing commercial laundry services, EVS, and infection prevention about the systems behind a successful reusable linen program. They discuss linen quality, reject rates, unnecessary waste, frontline education, data, PAR levels, infection prevention oversight, and why strong relationships between health care facilities and their laundry providers matter.
A group of students raising their hands in class during a lecture  (Adobe Stock 292282454 by Mediteraneo
How do you celebrate an infection that never happened? That's one of the unusual challenges infection preventionists share with teachers. Both can spend their careers changing outcomes they may never see. Both educate people who don't always want to listen. Both are second-guessed. Both face burnout. And both must somehow keep remembering why they started.
Donald Sipp, Jr, MBA, RESE, CHESP, CHTI-2, CMIP, PMP, and David Green  (Image credit: author)
“Cutting” waste shouldn’t mean cutting people. At AHE Exchange26, David Green and Donald Sipp explored how EVS departments can improve performance by strengthening workplace culture, empowering employees, eliminating inefficient processes, and understanding EVS’s critical role in patient throughput. One case study showed bed turnaround times falling from nearly 2 hours to less than an hour, but the larger lesson wasn't simply about speed. High-performing EVS operations begin with a strong foundation.